Διάγραμμα των μεταηθικών θεωριών: Διαφορά μεταξύ των αναθεωρήσεων

Γραμμή 60:
| colspan="3" | ΝΑΙ || ΌΧΙ
|-
| colspan="3" | '''Ρεαλισμός'''<ref>Για τον ρεαλισμό ως υποκατηγορία του αντικειμενισμού, βλ. τις παρατηρήσεις του A. Marmor: «''[R]ealism presumes the existence of an objective reality which is ontologically independent of our knowledge. On the other hand, one can be an objectivist about kinds of object that do not meet this independence condition. Objectivity, in other words, does not entail, as realism does, the possibility of verification-transcendent truths within the realm about which one is objectivist. For example, the existence and constitution of many types of object is a matter of social or cultural construction. There is no reason to deny the possibility of objectivity about such cultural objects. There is, in fact, a whole range of concepts and classes of statement about which it would make perfect sense to hold an anti-realist and objectivist stance. Consider, for example, statements describing: the annual rate of inflation in the UK; the rules of chess; the legal speed limit for driving in California; the ordinary perceptions of colours; the ordinary meanings of words in a natural language; and, say, the basic plot of Pride and Prejudice''» (Andrei Marmor, ''Three Concepts of Objectivity'', εις Andrei Marmor, ''Positive Law and Objective Values'', Clarendon Press, Οξφόρδη, 2001, σελ. 112-134: 117-118).</ref>|| '''Αντιρεαλισμός'''
| colspan="3" | '''Ρεαλισμός'''|| '''Αντιρεαλισμός'''
|-
| colspan="3" | Η ηθική αντικειμενική πραγματικότητα είναι φυσική; || rowspan="6" |